How To Identify The Right Free Evolution For You

· 6 min read
How To Identify The Right Free Evolution For You

What is Free Evolution?

Free evolution is the idea that natural processes can lead to the development of organisms over time. This includes the creation of new species as well as the change in appearance of existing ones.

This has been demonstrated by numerous examples, including stickleback fish varieties that can thrive in salt or fresh water, and walking stick insect varieties that have a preference for specific host plants. These are mostly reversible traits, however, cannot explain fundamental changes in body plans.

Evolution through Natural Selection

The evolution of the myriad living creatures on Earth is a mystery that has intrigued scientists for centuries. The most well-known explanation is that of Charles Darwin's natural selection, a process that occurs when better-adapted individuals survive and reproduce more effectively than those less well-adapted. Over time, the population of well-adapted individuals grows and eventually develops into a new species.

Natural selection is an ongoing process that is characterized by the interaction of three factors that are inheritance, variation and reproduction. Variation is caused by mutations and sexual reproduction both of which enhance the genetic diversity of a species. Inheritance refers the transmission of a person’s genetic characteristics, which includes both dominant and recessive genes to their offspring. Reproduction is the process of creating viable, fertile offspring. This can be accomplished by both asexual or sexual methods.

All of these elements must be in balance to allow natural selection to take place. If, for instance the dominant gene allele causes an organism reproduce and last longer than the recessive allele, then the dominant allele is more prevalent in a population. If the allele confers a negative advantage to survival or reduces the fertility of the population, it will go away. The process is self reinforcing which means that an organism with an adaptive trait will live and reproduce far more effectively than those with a maladaptive trait. The more offspring an organism can produce, the greater its fitness that is determined by its ability to reproduce itself and survive. Individuals with favorable characteristics, such as the long neck of giraffes, or bright white patterns on male peacocks are more likely than others to live and reproduce, which will eventually lead to them becoming the majority.

Natural selection is only an element in the population and not on individuals. This is a major distinction from the Lamarckian theory of evolution which argues that animals acquire traits by use or inactivity. For instance, if a animal's neck is lengthened by reaching out to catch prey and its offspring will inherit a larger neck. The differences in neck length between generations will persist until the giraffe's neck becomes too long that it can no longer breed with other giraffes.

Evolution through Genetic Drift

In the process of genetic drift, alleles within a gene can be at different frequencies in a group due to random events. Eventually, only one will be fixed (become widespread enough to not longer be eliminated through natural selection), and the other alleles diminish in frequency. This can result in a dominant allele in the extreme. The other alleles are essentially eliminated, and heterozygosity is reduced to zero. In a small number of people, this could lead to the complete elimination of recessive alleles. This is known as a bottleneck effect and it is typical of the kind of evolutionary process that takes place when a large amount of individuals migrate to form a new population.

에볼루션코리아  may also occur when the survivors of a disaster like an outbreak or mass hunting incident are concentrated in a small area. The survivors will carry an allele that is dominant and will share the same phenotype. This situation could be caused by earthquakes, war or even plagues. The genetically distinct population, if it is left, could be susceptible to genetic drift.

Walsh Lewens, Walsh, and Ariew define drift as a departure from the expected values due to differences in fitness.  에볼루션 바카라사이트  cite a famous example of twins that are genetically identical and have the exact same phenotype but one is struck by lightning and dies, while the other lives and reproduces.

This kind of drift can play a significant part in the evolution of an organism. However, it's not the only method to progress. The primary alternative is a process called natural selection, where phenotypic variation in the population is maintained through mutation and migration.

Stephens argues that there is a big difference between treating the phenomenon of drift as a force, or an underlying cause, and treating other causes of evolution like mutation, selection and migration as causes or causes. Stephens claims that a causal process explanation of drift lets us differentiate it from other forces and this distinction is essential. He further argues that drift has a direction: that is it tends to eliminate heterozygosity, and that it also has a size, that is determined by the size of the population.

Evolution by Lamarckism

When high school students study biology, they are often introduced to the work of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744 - 1829). His theory of evolution, commonly referred to as “Lamarckism” is based on the idea that simple organisms develop into more complex organisms by taking on traits that are a product of the organism's use and misuse. Lamarckism is typically illustrated by the image of a giraffe that extends its neck further to reach the higher branches in the trees. This could cause giraffes to pass on their longer necks to offspring, who would then grow even taller.

Lamarck was a French Zoologist. In his inaugural lecture for his course on invertebrate zoology at the Museum of Natural History in Paris on the 17th May 1802, he introduced an innovative concept that completely challenged the conventional wisdom about organic transformation. According to Lamarck, living things evolved from inanimate material through a series gradual steps. Lamarck was not the only one to suggest that this could be the case, but the general consensus is that he was the one being the one who gave the subject his first comprehensive and thorough treatment.

The popular narrative is that Lamarckism grew into a rival to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection and that the two theories fought it out in the 19th century. Darwinism eventually prevailed and led to the creation of what biologists today refer to as the Modern Synthesis. The theory argues the possibility that acquired traits can be inherited, and instead suggests that organisms evolve through the selective action of environmental factors, such as natural selection.

Lamarck and his contemporaries believed in the idea that acquired characters could be passed down to future generations. However, this idea was never a central part of any of their evolutionary theories. This is due in part to the fact that it was never tested scientifically.

It has been more than 200 years since the birth of Lamarck and in the field of genomics there is a growing evidence-based body of evidence to support the heritability acquired characteristics. This is sometimes called "neo-Lamarckism" or more often epigenetic inheritance. This is a model that is just as valid as the popular Neodarwinian model.

Evolution by adaptation

One of the most commonly-held misconceptions about evolution is its being driven by a struggle to survive. This is a false assumption and overlooks other forces that drive evolution. The fight for survival is better described as a fight to survive in a certain environment. This could include not only other organisms as well as the physical surroundings themselves.


Understanding how adaptation works is essential to comprehend evolution. The term "adaptation" refers to any characteristic that allows a living thing to survive in its environment and reproduce. It can be a physical structure like feathers or fur. It could also be a trait of behavior, like moving towards shade during the heat, or escaping the cold at night.

The survival of an organism is dependent on its ability to obtain energy from the environment and to interact with other living organisms and their physical surroundings. The organism must possess the right genes for producing offspring and to be able to access enough food and resources. Furthermore, the organism needs to be capable of reproducing itself at an optimal rate within its environmental niche.

These factors, in conjunction with mutations and gene flow can cause changes in the proportion of different alleles in the population's gene pool. As time passes, this shift in allele frequency can lead to the emergence of new traits and eventually new species.

Many of the features we admire in plants and animals are adaptations. For instance, lungs or gills that extract oxygen from air feathers and fur as insulation long legs to run away from predators, and camouflage to hide. To understand the concept of adaptation it is crucial to differentiate between physiological and behavioral characteristics.

Physiological adaptations, like thick fur or gills, are physical traits, while behavioral adaptations, such as the desire to find friends or to move to shade in hot weather, aren't. It is also important to note that the absence of planning doesn't make an adaptation. In fact, failure to consider the consequences of a decision can render it unadaptable despite the fact that it may appear to be logical or even necessary.